Petitions for Clemency!

Federal § 2255 Motions & Appeals!

Motions for Compassionate Release!

Installment Payment Plans Available!

Have Questions? Call (771) 201-6144

No Risk Assurance! If, after completing your in-depth case evaluation, we determine that your case does not present any meritorious issues, you will receive a refund, minus a 20% fee to cover our administrative and professional expenses.

This ensures you get an honest, transparent assessment without the risk of paying full price for a Motion that lacks merit.

A § 2255 Motion is where a federal defendant can challenge their conviction or sentence by filing their Motion in the district court where they were sentenced.

A Petition for Clemency is a request by a federal prisoner Petitioning the United States President to reduce or end their prison sentence. Although the Petition (Form) may

only be 8 pages, a perfected Petition could easily be 50-100 pages with Exhibits.

STEPS TO GETTING STARTED...

1

Building Your Case File Strategy

I will begin by "Purchasing" and gathering your pertinent case documents using my Pacer account. I will build you a personal case file on my computer, where I pull your documents and facts together in a single place, giving me a holistic view of your entire case for building a strong legal strategy.

2

I Research Your Case for Issues that have a Real Possibility of Leading to Your Prison Sentence Being Reducted Too

Using Custom Data Technology, I can take your issue(s) and discover whether federal courts have already GRANTED other defendants' appeals on an issue that is virtually identical to your own. By matching your issue with another winning case, it tells me that you may have a high probable chance of having your prison sentence reduced too. This is HUGE because it virtually shows me in advance how the court may likely rule in your case too.

3

Knowing in Advance How Your Court May Likely Rule in Your Case Gives You the Winning Advantage

After matching your issue with another case that has already been won, my goal is to replicate your issue using the other defendant's winning appeal brief(s). Using pertinent data from other winning cases, we can strategically prepare an Evaluation Memorandum detailing why the Court should rule in your favor too. Indeed! This gives you the cutting-edge advantage that you need to increase your opportunity of winning, too.

4

You Receive a Detailed Performance Report

Your Evaluation Report comes with a well-written, well-researched Memorandum (with supporting case law) showing you clearly why the Court should rule in your Favor.

5

Flexible Installment Payment Plan

My fees are affordable. If we agree to accept your case, we offer a limited assurance guarantee (as outlined here) and provide flexible installment payment plans to help you get started now.

Have questions? Please Call (771) 201-6144

6

Rest Assured With Your No-Risk Limited Guarantee for a Deep-Data Case Evaluation.

This Limited Guarantee applies to a "Deep-Data Case Evaluation." For instance, as stated in our written Agreement, if we determine that your case does not have any Meritorious issues that may potentially lead to your Sentence Reduction or Release from Prison, then you will receive a refund - minus 20% to cover expenses. It is that simple!

Have Questions? Please Call (771) 201-6144

Despite the Critics

and Naysayers...

"All Cases GRANTED in Favor of Defendants!"

SECTION 2255 MOTIONS GRANTED

GRANTED: On March 03, 2025, after the district court denied Mr. Alfred’s § 2255 motion the Federal Court of Appeals granted him a Certificate of Appealability (COA) on issues related to ineffective assistance of counsel, government misconduct, and errors by the trial court. See Alford v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 4897.

GRANTED: On May 01, 2025, after the Court of Appeals granted Drew's motion for authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion challenging his § 924(c) convictions, the court granted Drew's motion with respect to the § 924(c) claim because the Supreme Court's decisions in Taylor and Davis establish that attempted Hobbs Act robbery does not qualify as a "crime of violence" under § 924(c). Therefore, Drew's § 924(c) convictions are vacated. See In re Drew, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 10641

GRANTED: On March 19, 2025, the government and the district court both agreed with Mr. Johnson’s argument that his prior cocaine drug conviction under Texas state law was NOT a "serious drug felony," triggering a ten-year mandatory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. Section 841(b)(1)(B). See United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50989. See also, United States v. Davis, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 28757 (Career Offender Vacated. Sentence reduced from 210 months to 96 months.)

GRANTED: On January 03, 2025, the district court granted Rose's 28 USCS § 2255 motion in part, finding ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to raise the suppression ruling on appeal. The court vacated Rose's sentence and reimposed it to allow him to appeal. See United States v. Rose, 124 F.4th 1101.

GRANTED: On February 21, 2025, the appellate court granted Rendelman authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, finding that he satisfied the gatekeeping requirements by presenting a prima facie showing of a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive by the Supreme Court. See  In re Rendelman, 129 F.4th 248.

Hobbs Act Conspiracy - Three Armed Robberies - Firearm Sentence Reduced by 17-Years

United States v. Turnipseed, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241336, Decided December 17, 2021, Dist. of South Carolina, CR No. 3:12-40-JFA. This case involved three-violent armed robberies. In Alfred’s Motion for Compassionate Release, the main issue was that his 32-year prison sentence is excessive as a result of his two "stacked" 924(c) gun convictions and, although the change in law is NOT retroactive, this non-retroactive change in law presents an extraordinary and compelling reason for the court to reduce his sentence. The Court agreed! Compassionate Release GRANTED!

Career Offender with Numerous Prior Felony Convictions GRANTED Immediate Compassionate Release!

United States v. Wilson, 2020 WL 5894193, (N.D. Iowa Oct. 5, 2020) (136 month sentence, major criminal history with numerous felonies, career offender.) Compassionate Release GRANTED!

United States v. Pape, 2020 WL 6042397, (D. Minn. Oct. 13, 2020) (Received 180 month sentence for being a felon in possession of firearm. Sentence enhanced as a career offender because of numerous prior convictions.) Compassionate Release GRANTED!

§ 2255 Motion Results in 10-year Sentence Reduction... and Immediate Release from Prison for Brother and Sister!

Ornelas-Castro v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54355, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Judge Ed Kinkade (After completing Juan's Deep-Data Case Evaluation, Juan and his sister, Damarius Ornelas, I was hired to prepare both of their Sec. 2255 Motions. Yes! Both Juan and Damarius were entitled to relief under Sec. 2255 because we proved that their kidnapping convictions could not be a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(3)'s firearm elements clause. Both sentences Reduced by 10-Years resulting in Immediate Release from prison for Juan and Damarius).

§ 2255 Motion Granted for Ineffective Counsel

Flores-Rivera v. United States (1st Cir. October 2021) (The First Circuit reversed a district court’s order denying defendant’s motion to vacate sentence and conviction under 28 USC 2255. The defendant’s appellate attorney had been ineffective for failure to raise a Brady claim. Court of Appeals Ruled in favor of defendant. 

Granted Compassionate Release After Defendant Received Three-Life Sentences for Violent Offenses!

United States v. Rios, 2020 WL 7246440, (D. Conn. Dec. 8, 2020) (Life sentence for Latin Kings RICO involving murder. Factoring in Mr. Rios’s post-sentencing rehabilitation where he completed courses offered by the BOP and received minor disciplinary infractions while incarcerated.

Immediate Compassionate Release GRANTED!

CLEMENCY PETITIONS GRANTED

GRANTED: On January 17, 2025, the President commuted the sentence for my client, Deandre Lewis, after being convicted and sentenced for conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance; being an Armed Career Criminal; and for causing the death of a person through the use of a firearm. See United States v Deandre Lewis, US Dist. Court, Southern District of Illinois (Case No. 3:98-cr-30022-NJR-3).

GRANTED: On January 21, 2025, my client, Khyre Holber was Granted Clemency and released from prison after being sentenced to 240 months for distribution of drugs, use carry of a firearm, and for being a felon in possession of a firearm. See United States v Khyre Holbert, US Dist. Cout, Nebraska (8:17-cr-00189-RFR-MDN)

GRANTED: On January 17, 2025, my client, Josand Farmer received an Executive Grant of Clemency commuting his 280-month prison sentence for drug conspiracy and distribution charges. Josand filed his Petition in Pro Se. See United States v Josand Farmer, US Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. NC (Case No. 5:10-cr-00271-FL-3).

GRANTED: On January 21, 2025, President Trump Granted Ross's Petition for a Pardon. Ross was sentenced to LIFE imprisonment after being convicted for Aiding and abetting distribution of drugs over internet; continuing criminal enterprise; computer hacking conspiracy; fraud with identification documents; money laundering conspiracy. See United States v. Ulbricht, 31 F. Supp. 3d 540 (S.D. N.Y. 2014).

GRANTED: On May 29, 2025, President Trump Granted Joe Sotelo an immediate release from federal prison after being sentenced to LIFE in prison for charges involving conspiracy, possession with intent to distribute one kilogram of cocaine, and aiding and abetting. See United States v. Sotelo, Northern District of Texas, No. 4:95-cr-05.

GRANTED: On May 29, 2025, President Trump Granted Edward Rubin Sotelo a Clemency from his life sentence for conspiracy; continuing criminal enterprise; possession with intent to distribute 1 kilogram of cocaine, aiding and abetting (two counts); use of telephone to facilitate commission of a felony (three counts); possession with intent to distribute 10 pounds of marijuana, and aiding and abetting; distribution of more than five kilograms of cocaine and aiding and abetting.

Huge International Drug Conspiracy-Granted Compassionate Release

United States v. Siavosh Henareh, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6855, S.D. NY (Mr. Golden prepared Mr. Henareh's Motion for Compassionate Release - after completing his Case Evaluation. Mr. Henareh was Granted Compassionate Release following his conviction for conspiracy to import some 400-pounds of heroin into the United States, in order to finance weapons purchases for Hezbollah—a foreign terrorist organization. Granted Compassionate Release!

Current Federal Sentence Reduced after Having Prior Criminal Convictions Expunged-Vacated-Erased

Clay v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49023, (Movant successfully argued that Sec. 851 does not prevent him from returning to federal court for resentencing after he has had his state conviction vacated.)

United States v. Mobley, 96 Fed. Appx. 127, No. 03-6345, 2004 WL 914458 (4th Cir.) (Vacating denial of 2255 petition and remanding for resentencing where state conviction that was set aside after federal sentencing based upon constitutional invalidity of the guilty plea was "expunged" and should not have been included in calculating criminal history points)

Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 497, 114 S. Ct. 1732, 128 L. Ed. 2d 517, (Where a petitioner "is successful in attacking [his] state sentences, they may then apply for reopening of any federal sentence enhanced by the state sentences.)

Granted Compassionate Release Due to Defendant's Children in need of a guardian to care for them!

See, also... United States v. Fortson, 2020 WL 3963729, (S.D. Ind. July 13, 2020) (Cousin caretaker of defendant’s child doesn’t have legal status as guardian and has limited finances) GRANTED Compassionate Release!

Granted Compassionate Release Due to Defendants Family Circumstances!

United States v. Howell, 2020 WL 7260740, at *1 (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2020) (Mother is 68 and suffers from dementia “and could use Mr. Bryant’s assistance in the home.) Compassionate Release GRANTED!

See, also... United States v. Morrison, 2020 WL 6806765, (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2020) (Children, 15 and 16, have medical conditions, current caregiver is 60-year-old mother with bad back Compassionate Release GRANTED!

A WIN-WIN SOLUTION!

NEED HELP?

No Money-No Problem!

Call About Our Installment Plan!

Phone: (771) 201-6144

ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIPS:

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers!

American Bar Association!

Disclosure: The information on this page is for informational purposes only and is not to be used or considered as legal advice. The cases and laws cited are based on public information available [in part] via the Internet. Bill Golden provides the limited services mentioned herein from the state of Delaware. Bill Golden is a Legal Assistant Post Conviction Specialist, and as such, he is an Associate Member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Although Bill Golden is not a licensed attorney, based on Bill Golden's prior [2003-2004) Federal Court Orders he is legally authorized to prepare post-conviction motions for pro se federal defendants who sign their pleadings and file them in the federal court having jurisdiction over their criminal case. Additionally, as a post-conviction legal assistant with over 20 years of experience, Bill Golden works with attorneys and their clients by researching their cases, locating meritorious issues, and preparing signature-ready Appeal Briefs and Motions. Golden Legal Resources provides Self-Help services (Appeal Brief Templates) to the public, inmates, and attorneys. Bill Golden is not an attorney or a law firm. If you need legal advice, we advise you to speak with a licensed attorney. Although Bill Golden is not an attorney, he may assist attorneys and pro se federal defendants/inmates by researching their cases and preparing signature-ready appeal briefs and motions. Bill Golden (hereinafter "Golden") has provided the information contained herein for general matters of interest only. Golden can provide attorneys with advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, and the selection of forms or strategies in seeking post-conviction relief. Moreover, Bill Golden offers his services in all states other than Virginia. Because it is against the Code of Professional Ethics to guarantee the outcome of a future legal proceeding, Bill Golden cannot and does not guarantee the outcome of a customer's future legal proceedings. Finally, Bill Golden declares that he genuinely believes that he is authorized to provide his services because of a previous Agreement reached with the United States Attorney's Office, which was approved and accepted by a Federal Court of Law. Everything considered, Bill Golden provides the services mentioned herein from the state of Delaware.