Federal Appeals!
If Your "Deep-Data Case Evaluation" does not result in us finding Meritorious Issues that have a real possibility of leading to your prison sentence being reduced, then you can rest assured in knowing that you are backed by our LIMITED ASSURANCE GUARANTEE!
Your "Deep-Data Case Evaluation"
Is Backed By Our No-Risk Guarantee!
Not every defendant's case has strong issues for appeal. Therefore, after we complete your "Deep-Data Case Evaluation", if we determine that your case does not have any Meritorious Issue(s) that may lead to your sentence reduction or your reversal in conviction, You Will Receive a Refund, minus 20% to cover our expenses.
If you are seeking to challenge your wrongful conviction or erroneous prison sentence, it begins with these 6-Proven-Steps...
1
Building Your Case File Strategy
I will begin by "Purchasing" and gathering your pertinent case documents using my Pacer account. I will build you a personal case file on my computer, where I pull your documents and facts together in a single place, giving me a holistic view of your entire case for building a strong legal strategy.
2
I Research Your Case for Issues that have a Real Possibility of Leading to Your Prison Sentence Being Reducted Too
Using Custom Data Technology, I can take your issue(s) and discover whether federal courts have already GRANTED other defendants' appeals on an issue that is virtually identical to your own. By matching your issue with another winning case, it tells me that you may have a high probable chance of having your prison sentence reduced too. This is HUGE because it virtually shows me in advance how the court may likely rule in your case too.
3
Knowing in Advance How Your Court May Likely Rule in Your Case Gives You the Winning Advantage
After matching your issue with another case that has already been won, my goal is to replicate your issue using the other defendant's winning appeal brief(s). Using pertinent data from other winning cases, we can strategically prepare an Evaluation Memorandum detailing why the Court should rule in your favor too. Indeed! This gives you the cutting-edge advantage that you need to increase your opportunity of winning too.
"It is virtually like you Piggybacking on Another Winning appeal."
4
You Receive a Detailed Performance Report
Your Evaluation Report comes with a well-written, well-researched Memorandum (with supporting case law) showing you clearly why the Court should rule in your Favor.
Yes! Your Evaluation Report will be concise, and easy to read while keeping in mind that your goal is to Win!
5
Fee Credit Toward Preparing Your Motion
My fee for conducting a Deep-Data Case Evaluation depends on whether you pleaded guilty or went to trial. For instance, if you pleaded guilty, then my total fee is $1200. If you went to trial, then my fee is $1200, plus an extra $125 for each day of trial. If you later decide that you want me to prepare your Federal Motion, then I will "CREDIT" your fee paid for your Deep-Data Case Evaluation Report toward the cost of preparing your future Motion for Relief.
6
Rest Assured With Your No-Risk Limited Guarantee for a Deep-Data Case Evaluation.
Although this Limited Guarantee does not apply to federal motions or briefs, Your "Deep-Data Case Evaluation" does come with a No-Risk Limited Money-Back Guarantee. For instance, as stated in our written Agreement, if we determine that your case does not have any Meritorious issues that may potentially lead to your Sentence Reduction or Release from Prison, then you will receive a refund - minus 20% to cover my expenses. It is that simple!
Despite the Critics
and Naysayers...
"All Cases GRANTED in Favor of Defendants!"
Hobbs Act Conspiracy - Three Armed Robberies - Firearm Sentence Reduced by 17-Years
United States v. Turnipseed, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 241336, Decided December 17, 2021, Dist. of South Carolina, CR No. 3:12-40-JFA. This case involved three-violent armed robberies. In Alfred’s Motion for Compassionate Release, the main issue was that his 32-year prison sentence is excessive as a result of his two "stacked" 924(c) gun convictions and, although the change in law is NOT retroactive, this non-retroactive change in law presents an extraordinary and compelling reason for the court to reduce his sentence. The Court agreed! Compassionate Release GRANTED!
Career Offender with Numerous Prior Felony Convictions GRANTED Immediate Compassionate Release!
United States v. Wilson, 2020 WL 5894193, (N.D. Iowa Oct. 5, 2020) (136 month sentence, major criminal history with numerous felonies, career offender.) Compassionate Release GRANTED!
§ 2255 Motions Result in 10-year Sentence Reduction... and Immediate Release from Prison for Brother and Sister!
Ornelas-Castro v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54355, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, Judge Ed Kinkade (After completing Juan's Deep-Data Case Evaluation, Juan and his sister, Damarius Ornelas, I was hired to prepare both of their Sec. 2255 Motions. Yes! Both Juan and Damarius were entitled to relief under Sec. 2255 because we proved that their kidnapping convictions could not be a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(c)(3)'s firearm elements clause. Both sentences Reduced by 10-Years resulting in Immediate Release from prison for Juan and Damarius).
Granted Compassionate Release After Defendant Received Three-Life Sentences for Violent Offenses!
United States v. Rios, 2020 WL 7246440, (D. Conn. Dec. 8, 2020) (Life sentence for Latin Kings RICO involving murder. Factoring in Mr. Rios’s post-sentencing rehabilitation where he completed courses offered by the BOP and received minor disciplinary infractions while incarcerated.
Immediate Compassionate Release GRANTED!
Granted Compassionate Release Due to Defendants Family Circumstances!
United States v. Howell, 2020 WL 7260740, at *1 (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2020) (Mother is 68 and suffers from dementia “and could use Mr. Bryant’s assistance in the home.) Compassionate Release
GRANTED!
See, also... United States v. Morrison, 2020 WL 6806765, (D. Nev. Nov. 19, 2020) (Children, 15 and 16, have medical conditions, current caregiver is 60-year-old mother with bad back Compassionate Release GRANTED!
See, also... United States v. Fortson, 2020 WL 3963729, (S.D. Ind. July 13, 2020) (Cousin caretaker of defendant’s child doesn’t have legal status as guardian and has limited finances) GRANTED Compassionate Release!
Compassionate Release After Serving Little Prison Time
United States v. Carlita Fowler, 445 F. Supp. 3d 452 (The Court sentenced her to sixty months in prison for distributing methamphetamine. On June 06, 2020, the Court GRANTED her a compassionate release after serving only 11 months of the 60 month sentence.)
See, also... United States v. Morgan, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 204067 (Mr. Morgan was sentenced to 120 months based on 924(c) gun charge, reported to prison in January 2020, served 10 months; crimes involved selling drugs and firearm.) GRANTED COMPASSIONATE RELEASE AFTER SERVING 10-MONTHS ON A 10-YEAR SENTENCE.
See, United States v. Sweet, 07-20369, 2021 WL 1430836 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 15, 2021) (GRANTING Compassionate Release despite receiving vaccine and recovering from COVID-19, noting that breakthrough infections in prison and risk from COVID-19 reinfection justfy immediate release).
Compassionate Release Granted Although Defendants were Vaccinated!
United States v. Reyes, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99864, (D. Conn. May 26, 2021) (GRANTING compassionate release of defendant who received both doses of the vaccine; “newly available data describe ‘breakthrough infections’ caused by COVID variants in vaccinated populations” justifies immediate release from prison.)
See, also... United States v. Darby, 2021 WL 2463841, (N.D. Ohio June 17, 2021) (“The Court acknowledges that Mr. Darby is vaccinated so he is at a reduced risk of contracting a serious form of COVID-19 but being vaccinated does not automatically preclude a defendant from demonstrating “extraordinary and compelling reasons” justifying a sentence modification.” GRANTED Compassionate Release despite Defendant’s lengthy prior criminal record.
PRIOR STATE CONVICTIONS EXPUNGED!
Current Federal Sentence Reduced after Having Prior Criminal Convictions Expunged-Vacated-Erased
Clay v. United States, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49023, (Movant successfully argued that Sec. 851 does not prevent him from returning to federal court for resentencing after he has had his state conviction vacated.)
Mateo v. United States, 398 F.3d 126, 127 (4th Cir.) (The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual makes it clear that sentences for expunged convictions, … are not to be counted for enhancement purposes.)
United States v. Mobley, 96 Fed. Appx. 127, No. 03-6345, 2004 WL 914458 (4th Cir.) (Vacating denial of 2255 petition and remanding for resentencing where state conviction that was set aside after federal sentencing based upon constitutional invalidity of the guilty plea was "expunged" and should not have been included in calculating criminal history points)
Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485, 497, 114 S. Ct. 1732, 128 L. Ed. 2d 517, (Where a petitioner "is successful in attacking [his] state sentences, they may then apply for reopening of any federal sentence enhanced by the state sentences.)
United States v. Merryman, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3336, (The court held that it was an error to sentence the defendant to 15 years imprisonment as an armed career criminal because his juvenile adjudication had been expunged prior to sentencing and the Act did not allow the consideration of convictions which had been expunged as defined by state law.)
Huge International Drug Conspiracy-Granted Compassionate Release
United States v. Siavosh Henareh, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6855, S.D. NY (Mr. Golden prepared Mr. Henareh's Motion for Compassionate Release - after completing his Case Evaluation. Mr. Henareh was Granted Compassionate Release following his conviction for conspiracy to import some 400-pounds of heroin into the United States, in order to finance weapons purchases for Hezbollah—a foreign terrorist organization. Granted Compassionate Release!
After Court Denied Defendant's First TWO-Motions for Compassionate Release, the Court GRANTS His "THIRD" Motion Filed for Compassionate Release!
United States v. Hendry, 2020 WL 4015487, (S.D. Fla. July 16, 2020) (Court denied Hendry’s first TWO-Motions for Compassionate Release. Court GRANTED his THIRD-Motion for Compassionate Release after he got COVID-10.
United States v. Arceo, 2020 WL 4001339, (N.D. Cal. July 15, 2020) (After the Court denied Areco's First Motion for Compassionate Release, he filed a Second Motion for Compassionate Release “based on the new (and alarming) COVID-19 outbreak at his prison). Compassionate Release GRANTED!
See, also... United States v. Herring, 2020 WL 6886256, (E.D. Ky. Nov. 24, 2020) (After losing his first Motion for Compassionate Release, Mr. Herring filed a Second Motion for Compassionate Release based on new documentation) COMPASSIONATE RELEASE GRANTED!
See, also... United States v. Baylor, 2020 WL 5970679, (D.D.C. Oct. 8, 2020) (Granting Renewed-Second Motion for Compassionate Release, after previously denying first Motion based on no cases at his prison facility.)
See, also... United States v. Khawaja, 2020 WL 5549123, (D.N.H. Sept. 16, 2020) (After losing his first Motion for Compassionate Release, his Second-Renewed Motion was Granted because he added more records with his Second Motion. GRANTED Compassionate Release!
See, also... United States v. Mongelli, 2020 WL 6449237, (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2020) (Court denied Motion for Compassionate Release in August. Tested Positive for COVID in October. Court GRANTED his Renewed-Second Motion for Compassionate Release!
Career Offender with Major Criminal History GRANTED Compassionate Release!
United States v. Pape, 2020 WL 6042397, (D. Minn. Oct. 13, 2020) (Received 180 month sentence for being a felon in possession of firearm. Sentence enhanced as a career offender because of numerous prior convictions.) Compassionate Release GRANTED!
Sec. 2255 Motion Granted for Ineffective Counsel
Flores-Rivera v. United States (1st Cir. October 2021) (The First Circuit reversed a district court’s order denying defendant’s motion to vacate sentence and conviction under 28 USC 2255. The defendant’s appellate attorney had been ineffective for failure to raise a Brady claim. Court of Appeals Ruled in favor of defendant.
See, also... United States v. Hatcher, 2021 WL 1535310, (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 19, 2021) (GRANTING compassionate release to fully vaccinated woman, based on the extreme conditions of confinement during the pandemic.)
No Money-No Problem!
Call About Our Installment Plan!
A WIN-WIN SOLUTION!
"If Your Deep-Data Case Evaluation does not result in us finding Meritorious Issues that have a real possibility of leading to your prison sentence being reduced, then "YOU RECEIVE A REFUND" - Minus 20% to cover my out-of-pocket expenses and the purchase of your Criminal Case File, etc."
Golden Legal Resources maintains a Perfect FIVE-STAR Rating with the Better Business Bureau.
As a Legal Assistant Post-Conviction Specialist, Bill Golden is an Associate Member in good standing with The "National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers."
Disclosure: Bill Golden is a Legal Assistant Post Conviction Specialist, and as such, he is an Associate Member of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Although Bill Golden is not an attorney, based on Bill Golden's prior [2003-2004) Federal Court Orders he genuinely believes that he is legally authorized to prepare post-conviction motions for federal inmates without having to work under the direction of their legal counsel. In part, as a post-conviction legal assistant with over 20 years of experience, Bill Golden can work with attorneys and their clients by researching their cases, locating meritorious issues, and preparing signature-ready Appeal Briefs and Motions. The information on this page is for informational purposes only and is not to be used or considered as legal advice. The cases and laws cited are based on public information available [in part] via the Internet. Golden Legal Resources provides Self-Help services (Appeal Brief Templates) to the public, inmates, and attorneys. Bill Golden is not an attorney or a law firm. If you need legal advice, we advise you to speak with a licensed attorney. Although Bill Golden is not an attorney, he may assist attorneys and their clients by researching their cases and preparing signature-ready appeal briefs and motions. Bill Golden (hereinafter "Golden") has provided the information contained herein upon information for general matters of interest only. Golden may provide attorneys with advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, and selection of forms or strategies in seeking post-conviction relief. As a self-help legal service, Golden provides legal appeal brief templates to non-attorneys and inmates. Additionally, Bill Golden offers legal research services to attorneys and their clients virtually Nationwide. Bill Golden does not provide services from within Virginia or Washington, DC. Because it is against the Code of Professional Ethics to guarantee the outcome of a future legal proceeding, Bill Golden cannot and does not guarantee the outcome of a customer's future legal proceedings. Finally, Bill Golden declares that he genuinely believes that he is authorized to provide his limited services because of a previous Agreement reached with the United States Attorney's Office and that the Agreement was previously approved and accepted by a Federal Court of Law.
©2020 Optinizer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy | Created with Leadpages